New rules of birth: you can not need a husband, but you can not need a man

As soon as the new birth regulations in Sichuan came out, some independent women who only want children but don't want husbands immediately reveled in them. In their view, having a baby without a husband is the most perfect life.

Although this magical idea is completely incomprehensible in the eyes of most women in the traditional concept, and cannot become the mainstream of society, it is indeed one of the trends of thought in modern society, and it is not only a small number, but also on the rise, especially in some large cities, these ideas are more marketable.

Generally, such women have a certain degree of wealth and freedom. They no longer need to rely on men to provide support for their families. They are more independent and do not like to discuss things with others. If there are two masters in the family, and each holds his own views and does not give way to each other, life will become collapse.

For them, what they really need is a lovely child that can be held in their arms. Men, such creatures, need only when they sow seeds. Once the seeds germinate successfully, they have no need to exist.

In this sense, they may not need a husband, but they can not do without a man. Even if they adopt indirect methods such as public sperm bank of human beings through some scientific and technological means, in the final analysis, they still need men to provide half of the genes. That mode of cloning themselves is both unethical and does not have technical capabilities at present.

In the same way, this kind of concept is also a desirable thing in the eyes of some men. For many men, the purpose of marriage is just to stay behind. Once the task is completed, the spouse and children will be regarded as annoyance and drag, or they will directly take a blind approach.

For these two groups of people, this new regulation is no doubt as desirable as being customized. I think this is also the original intention of the new regulations, in order to make single women have no legal and medical barriers. Because before that, although there were no fewer cases of illegitimate children, they often had to go to private hospitals or even small clinics, which was a threat to women's life and health. Even if they were born healthily, their children's household registration would cause problems.

From the perspective of human survival and development, this new regulation is of progressive significance. It no longer regards marriage as a necessary mechanism for procreation. It is an acceptance of certain specific social phenomena and also a certain recognition of the multiple fertility mechanism.

However, this matter may become a major opportunity to change the traditional family model,

Throughout the ages, in the traditional family model, the childcare responsibilities of men are often more important, although they are not directly feeding their children. We are a traditional agricultural society. Men are often the main labor force of a family, while women are more likely to take the auxiliary role of "subsidizing the family" to do some small jobs and support the elderly. In this model, husband and wife are indispensable.

In modern times, although the concept of equality between men and women has become more and more popular in many large cities, the pattern of division of labor between men and women is still the mainstream. In general, the mother responsibility system is the dominant in the education of children, and it can be seen that the parents are talking about the mother.

But in terms of material creation, at present, more than half of the families are still dominated by men. Even in many countries and regions, women no longer work outside after marriage, become housewives, and are completely dependent on the family.

Even the independent women who advocate that children should not have husbands are likely to find it more difficult and difficult to take care of children alone as their children grow older and their own age increases after the initial period of satisfaction, and children who grow up in single-parent families may also appear unsound in character.

Just as many families who insisted on dink when they were young but chose to have children when they were not confused, many single mothers will finally realize that childbearing is ultimately a matter of two people, and one person's strength will not be able to overcome the obstacles of life, so it is better to have someone to carry it together.

Another problem that cannot be avoided is that the paternal line of children born out of wedlock is not young men in most cases. They are often so-called successful people. They are rich and affectionate in middle age, but the success of their career can not recover the decline of their physical functions. I am afraid that the genetic quality of this age can not be compared with that of their youth, so the physical quality of the children born is also worrying.

Another problem is that some women may choose to select excellent genes from the human sperm pool as the father of their children. This choice is often utilitarian and purposeful, and relevant organizations often set higher requirements for donors. Undoubtedly, these requirements are measured from a secular perspective.

For example, it is necessary to have a higher education, a higher face value and a higher social status, especially entrepreneurs, scientists and artists, who will be particularly popular, while those who are defined as losers have no qualification to enter the genetic genes.

This will inevitably cause a very serious problem. The diversity of human genes will be greatly challenged. In fact, many successful people are likely to be born at the bottom. It is only personal struggle and opportunities that make achievements, so this is not the credit of genes. But people will undoubtedly be utilitarian when choosing. In the long run, it will certainly cause serious damage to the diversity and stability of human genes.

So whether from the perspective of the healthy inheritance of human society or the normal operation of society, the traditional marriage model is still the best model for the healthy growth of children and the smooth operation of society, which is the same at all times and in all countries, which is also the original intention of nature to design gender.

Online Shopping Go To Limitebuy.com, Best Goods,Highest Discounts.